Thursday 23 November 2017

Swacchh Shelf Companies Abhayaan

Swacchh Shelf Companies Abhayaan

There is no definition given for Shell or Shelf company under Companies Act 2013 and also no other law/ legislature gives its meaning. As the name suggests, it means readymade companies with no/ minimal assets and no business operations done since registration. While, practically, there was a motive behind its existence i.e. intentional Arrangements to get tax incentives or exemptions but with time people started using them for illegal fraud intentions like Money Laundering, Insider Trading, etc.  In order to reduce the fraud through these shelf companies, there was enactment of Companies Act 2013 for better corporate practices, transparency and Corporate Compliances. Related Sections which were applicable to shelf companies were Sec 92 and Sec 164 of Companies Act 2013.
What is Sec 92 of Companies Act 2013?
92. (1) Every company shall prepare a return (hereinafter referred to as the annual return) in the prescribed form containing the particulars as they stood on the close of the financial year regarding—
(a) its registered office, principal business activities, particulars of its holding, subsidiary and associate companies;
(b) its shares, debentures and other securities and shareholding pattern;
(c) its indebtedness;
(d) its members and debenture-holders along with changes therein since the close of the previous financial year;
(e) its promoters, directors, key managerial personnel along with changes therein since the close of the previous financial year;
(f) meetings of members or a class thereof, Board and its various committees along with attendance details;
3[(g) remuneration of directors and key managerial personnel;]
(h) penalty or punishment imposed on the company, its directors or officers and details of compounding of offences and appeals made against such penalty or punishment;
(i) matters relating to certification of compliances, disclosures as may be prescribed;
(j) details, as may be prescribed, in respect of shares held by or on behalf of the Foreign Institutional Investors indicating their names, addresses, countries of incorporation, registration and percentage of shareholding held by them; and
(k) such other matters as may be prescribed,
and signed by a director and the company secretary, or where there is no company secretary, by a company secretary in practice:
4[Provided that in relation to One Person Company and small company, the annual return shall be signed by the company secretary, or where there is no company secretary, by the director of the company.]
(2) The annual return, filed by a listed company or, by a company having such paid-up capital and turnover as may be prescribed, shall be certified by a company secretary in practice in the prescribed form, stating that the annual return discloses the facts correctly and adequately and that the company has complied with all the provisions of this Act.
1&2[(3) An extract of the annual return in such form as may be prescribed shall form part of the Board's report.]
(4) Every company shall file with the Registrar a copy of the annual return, within sixty days from the date on which the annual general meeting is held or where no annual general meeting is held in any year within sixty days from the date on which the annual general meeting should have been held together with the statement specifying the reasons for not holding the annual general meeting, with such fees or additional fees as may be prescribed, within the time as specified, under section 403.
(5) If a company fails to file its annual return under sub-section (4), before the expiry of the period specified under section 403 with additional fee, the company shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than fifty thousand rupees but which may extend to five lakhs rupees and every officer of the company who is in default shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months or with fine which shall not be less than fifty thousand rupees but which may extend to five lakh rupees, or with both.
(6) If a company secretary in practice certifies the annual return otherwise than in conformity with the requirements of this section or the rules made thereunder, he shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than fifty thousand rupees but which may extend to five lakh rupees.

Exceptions/ Modifications/ Adaptations
1. In case of Specified IFSC Public Company - Sub-section (3) of section 92 shall not apply. - Notification Date 4th January, 2017
2. In case of Specified IFSC Private Company - Sub-section (3) of section 92 shall not apply. - Notification Date 4th January, 2017
3. In case of Private Company - Clause(g) of Sub-Section (1) of Section 92 shall apply to private companies namely:-
"(g)  "aggregate amount of remuneration drawn by directors;". - Notification Dated 13th June, 2017 
4. In case of Private Company - proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 92 for the proviso the following proviso shall be substituted, nametv:-


"Provided that in relation to One Person Company, small company and private company (if such private company is a start-up), the annual return shall be signed by the company secretary, or where there is no company secretary, by the
director of the company.". Notification Dated 13th June, 2017 

What is Sec 164 of Companies Act 2013?
Disqualifications for Appointment of Director
Notified Date of Section: 01/04/2014
164. (1) A person shall not be eligible for appointment as a director of a company, if —
(a) he is of unsound mind and stands so declared by a competent court;
(b) he is an undischarged insolvent;
(c) he has applied to be adjudicated as an insolvent and his application is pending;
(d) he has been convicted by a court of any offence, whether involving moral turpitude or otherwise, and sentenced in respect thereof to imprisonment for not less than six months and a period of five years has not elapsed from the date of expiry of the sentence:
Provided that if a person has been convicted of any offence and sentenced in respect thereof to imprisonment for a period of seven years or more, he shall not be eligible to be appointed as a director in any company;
(e) an order disqualifying him for appointment as a director has been passed by a court or Tribunal and the order is in force;
(f) he has not paid any calls in respect of any shares of the company held by him, whether alone or jointly with others, and six months have elapsed from the last day fixed for the payment of the call;
(g) he has been convicted of the offence dealing with related party transactions under 
section 188 at any time during the last preceding five years; or
(h) he has not complied with sub-section (3) of 
section 152.
1[(2) No person who is or has been a director of a company which—
(a) has not filed financial statements or annual returns for any continuous period of three financial years; or
(b) has failed to repay the deposits accepted by it or pay interest thereon or to redeem any debentures on the due date or pay interest due thereon or pay any dividend declared and such failure to pay or redeem continues for one year or more, shall be eligible to be re-appointed as a director of that company or appointed in other company for a period of five years from the date on which the said company 
fails to do so.]
(3) A private company may by its articles provide for any disqualifications for appointment as a director in addition to those specified in sub-sections (1) and (2):
Provided that the disqualifications referred to in clauses (d), (e) and (g) of sub-section (1) shall not take effect—
(i) for thirty days from the date of conviction or order of disqualification;
(ii) where an appeal or petition is preferred within thirty days as aforesaid against the conviction resulting in sentence or order, until expiry of seven days from the date on which such appeal or petition is disposed off; or
(iii) where any further appeal or petition is preferred against order or sentence within seven days, until such further appeal or petition is disposed off.

So, Sec 92 requires all companies including small Private Limited, closely held companies to file Annual Returns. Further Sec 164 states that Directors of that shell companies if fails to file Financial Statements or Annual Returns of the company for continuous 3 years shall be disqualified to be Directors for a period of Five years.
Read more on Disqualification of Directors at the link below;
So, basically new Companies Act 2013 have come up with strict law wherein false motives like fraud money laundering etc not allowed. Old Companies Act 1956 used to have no provision for Disqualification of Directors for Private Limited Companies.


Monday 6 November 2017

DISQUALIFICATION OF DIRECTORS

DISQUALIFICATION OF DIRECTORS
BACKGROUND
MCA has started to strike-off companies that are dormant and disqualify Directors of Companies that have not filed their MCA annual return continuously for over three years.
A person can be disqualified from being a Director, if a company on which the person is a Director has not filed MCA annual return for a continuous period of three years.  Hence, it’s important for all private limited company, one person company and limited company to file MCA annual return on time and maintain compliance under Companies Act, 2013.
Ministry of Corporate Affairs along with Ministry of Finance has taken actions against the Shell Companies i.e. those Companies which have not filed the Financial Statement and Annual Return with ROC.
Why were these directors barred?
·           For not doing RoC filing and
·           For not completing other formalities related to compliance after show-cause notice was served.
The Directors whose names have been barred:
·           Cannot hold any board position in new ventures
·           They will not have to step down from the board of other companies on which they are currently directors. 
·           The law allows the government to bar these directors from taking up any board position for five years 

The steps taken are:




Before discussing the provisions with respect to Disqualification of Directors, let us have a look at a recent ruling in this regard;
Disqualified Directors of debarred company approach Courts:
The government move to debar directors of companies who have not filed Annual Returns for successive three years is being challenged in court of law citing retrospective application of Companies Act 2013.
It is settled position with several Supreme Court rulings wherein law is always applicable retrospectively unless any prior date is mentioned specifically. Sec 164 of Companies Act 2013 is applicable to all companies including Private Limited Companies w.e.f 1st April 2014.
Prior to the enactment of Companies Act 2013, the corresponding Section 274(1)(g) under Companies Act 1956 was applicable only to Public Companies. Subsequently, now when 3years be elapsed for non filing of Annual Returns would be for those companies whose AGM is due at the end of the month of Sep 2017 to which filing is due in October 2017. However MCA had debarred disqualified Directors at the starting of Sep 2017. Let’s understand it with Example;
FY
Annual Filing Requirement Post Companies Act 2014
2014-15
30th October 2015
2015-16
30th October 2016
2016-17
30th October 2017

However, Madras HC stays ROC order disqualifying Directors dated 30th Sep 2017. See the link below;

Let us first discuss the provisions with respect to Companies’ Act 2013 for disqualification of directors (SECTION 164)

REMEDIES AVAILABLE:
The following remedies are available after disqualification                                    

FIRST REMEDY
If your Directors have been Disqualified by the concerned ROC u/s 164(2)(a) of Companies Act, 2013 for non filling of financial statements or annual returns for a continuous period of three Financial years, then the said disqualification can be removed by making following steps:
1.      First filling a restoration petition before the concerned NCLT u/s 252(3) of Companies Act, 2013
2.      Taking an order from NCLT upon Report from ROC for restoration of the name of company in the Register of Companies as maintained by Concerned ROC
3.      Completion of all pending annual fillings As per the directions from NCLT
Further, as the director has contravened Sec 164(2)(a) of Companies Act, 2013, NCLT may impose certain penalties u/s 172 of Companies Act, 2013
SECOND REMEDY

Second Remedy available is by filling Physical letter with ROC and requesting them to appoint new director after obtaining approval
 promoter or, in his absence, the Central Government shall appoint the required number of directors who shall hold office till the
directors are appointed by the company in the general meeting

Examples cited below may help you to understand the situation clearly
Mr. A, who holds the position of Director in 5 companies i.e. X Ltd., Y Ltd., Z Ltd., P Ltd., and Q Ltd.
Suppose P Ltd., made default u/s 164(2) i.e. has not filed financial statements or annual returns for any continuous period of three financial years as a result of which The name of Company has been struck off from the record of ROC and name of Mr. A has been mentioned in the list of disqualified directors by MCA on September, 12 2017
Consequence of such disqualification on other companies:
Once a person is disqualified as a Director, he/she will not be eligible for being appointed as Director of that company or any other company for a period of 5 years from the date on which the company failed to file annual compliance.
Also if such director (here Mr. A) files any form in other Company (i.e. X Ltd., Y Ltd., Z Ltd., and Q Ltd) then an error is occurring that “the person associated with the DIN is disqualified and not allowed to file the form”
Intention of Ministry:
Once as director is disqualified u/s 164(2) (a) he has to vacate the office from all the Companies in which he is acting as director as a vacation u/s 167(1)

Note
Such disqualified director can freely continue as Shareholders in all the Companies irrespective they are disqualified u/s 164 and vacate office u/s 167.
In case you want to remove the Disqualification
As per The Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014 contain a provision pursuant to “application for removal of disqualification of directors shall be made in Form DIR-10.”
Rule 14(5) states that, “Any application for removal of disqualification of directors shall be made in Form DIR-10.” However this is physical form required to be file with other form with the appropriate authority.

For more details, contact CS Neha Seth at csnehaseth@gmail.com or call us at 9871903449