Friday 22 April 2016

Re-appointment of Auditors in ensuing AGM

Question:
A Listed/ Public Limited company has appointed an Audit Firm as its Statutory Auditors which will complete 5 years at the ensuing AGM for FY 2015-16 who are eligible for re-appointment for next 5 years.
Is it mandatory to appoint them for 5 years at the upcoming AGM of the Company or can they be appointed for less than 5 years as per Companies Act 2013?

Answer: The relevant Provisions are Sec 139 of Companies Act 2013 wherein, it says that maximum duration of a term of an Auditor is 5 years. It is important to note that the section specifically focus on the maximum limit and not minimum.
Further, section 139 also lays down the restriction on maximum number of terms an Auditor can stay which is 2 (Two). Here, Auditor means CA Firm and not individual CA.

Section 139(2):
No listed company or a company belonging to such class or classes of companies as may be prescribed, shall appoint or re-appoint-
a. An Individual as auditor for more than one term of five consecutive years; and
b. an Audit firm as auditor for more than two terms of five consecutive years

For more details, contact CS Neha Seth at csnehaseth@gmail.com or call us at 9871903449

Monday 18 April 2016

Overseas Direct Investment - Submission of Annual Performance Report- NEW RBI Update

RBI/2015-16/373
A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No.61
April 13, 2016
Overseas Direct Investment - Submission of Annual Performance Report
Attention of the Authorised Dealer (AD - Category I) banks is invited to the Notification No. FEMA 120/RB-2004 dated July 7, 2004 [Foreign Exchange Management (Transfer or Issue of any Foreign Security) (Amendment) Regulations, 2004] (the Notification), as amended from time to time. Attention of AD Category – I banks is also invited to A. P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 68 dated June 01, 2007 on Rationalisation of Forms, A. P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 29 dated September 12, 2012 on rationalisation of guidelines relating to submission of the Annual Performance Report (APR), A. P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 24 dated August 14, 2013 on Liberalised Remittance Scheme (LRS) by Resident Individuals under which they were allowed to set up JV / WOS outside India and para B.14 of FED Master Direction No. 15 /2015-16 dated January 1, 2016.
2. At present, an Indian Party (IP) / Resident Individual (RI) which has made an Overseas Direct Investment (ODI) has to comply with certain obligations prescribed under the Notification No. FEMA 120/RB-2004 dated July 07, 2004 as amended from time to time. One of these includes obligation for submission of an Annual Performance Report (APR) in Form ODI Part III to the Reserve Bank by 30th of June every year in respect of each Joint Venture (JV) / Wholly Owned Subsidiary (WOS) outside India set up or acquired by the IP / RI (as prescribed under Regulation 15 of FEMA Notification, ibid).
3. It has been observed that:
a.       IP / RI are either not regular in submitting the APR or are submitting it with delay. This is not in line with Regulation 15 of the Notification, ibid.
b.      Remittance/s and other forms of financial commitment are often facilitated by the designated Authorised Dealer bank (AD bank) under automatic route even though APR in respect of all overseas JV / WOS of the IP / RI effecting such remittance/s have not been submitted. This is in contravention of Regulation 6(2)(iv) of the Notification, ibid.
4. In order to provide AD banks greater capability to track submission of APRs and also improve compliance level in the matter of submission of APRs by the IPs / RIs, it is now advised as under:
a.       The online OID application has been suitably modified to enable the nodal office of the AD bank to view the outstanding position of all the APRs pertaining to an applicant including for those JV / WOS for which it is not the designated AD bank. Accordingly, the AD bank, before undertaking / facilitating any ODI related transaction on behalf of the eligible applicant, should necessarily check with its nodal office to confirm that all APRs in respect of all the JV / WOS of the applicant have been submitted;
b.      Certification of APRs by the Statutory Auditor or Chartered Accountant need not be insisted upon in the case of Resident Individuals. Self-certification may be accepted;
c.       In case multiple IPs / RIs have invested in the same overseas JV / WOS, the obligation to submit APR shall lie with the IP / RI having maximum stake in the JV / WOS. Alternatively, the IPs / RIs holding stake in the overseas JV / WOS may mutually agree to assign the responsibility for APR submission to a designated entity which may acknowledge its obligation to submit the APR in terms of Regulation 15 (iii) of Notification, ibid, by furnishing an appropriate undertaking to the AD bank;
d.      An IP / RI, which has set up / acquired a JV / WOS overseas in terms of the Regulations of the Notification, ibid, shall submit, to the AD bank every year, an APR in Form ODI Part II in respect of each JV / WOS outside India and other reports or documents by 31st of December each year or as may be specified by the Reserve Bank from time to time. The APR, so required to be submitted, shall be based on the latest audited annual accounts of the JV / WOS unless specifically exempted by the Reserve Bank.
5. AD banks may issue necessary instructions to all the dealing officials at the bank / branch level and put in place proper processes and systems to ensure compliance with the extant FEMA guidelines. Any non-compliance with the instruction relating to submission of APR shall be treated as contravention of Regulation 15 of the Notification No. FEMA 120/RB-2004 dated July 07, 2004 as amended and viewed seriously.
6. AD Category – I banks may bring the contents of this circular to the notice of their constituents and customers concerned.
8.The directions contained in this circular have been issued under section 10(4) and 11(1) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act 1999 (42 of 1999) and are without prejudice to permissions / approvals, if any, required under any other law.

Overseas Direct Investment (ODI) – Rationalization and reporting of ODI Forms- New RBI Update

RBI//2015-16/374
A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No.62
April 13, 2016
Overseas Direct Investment (ODI) – Rationalization and reporting of ODI Forms

Attention of the Authorised Dealer (AD - Category I) banks is invited to the Notification No. FEMA 120/RB-2004 dated July 7, 2004 [Foreign Exchange Management (Transfer or Issue of any Foreign Security) (Amendment) Regulations, 2004] (the Notification), as amended from time to time. Attention of AD Category – I banks is also invited to A. P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 68 dated June 01, 2007 and A. P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 15 dated August 21, 2012 on rationalisation of ODI Forms and instructions issued vide A. P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 24 dated August 14, 2013 wherein Resident Individuals (RI) were allowed to set up overseas JV/WOS within the Liberalised Remittance Scheme (LRS) limit. Attention of AD Category – I banks is also invited to A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 36 dated February 24, 2010, A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No.131 dated May 31, 2012 on the operationalization of the online reporting system of ODI, Para B.7 and Part II of FED Master Direction No. 15/2015-16 dated January 1, 2016 and Part VIII of FED Master Direction No. 18/2015-16 dated January 1, 2016.
2. At present, application for ODI is required to be made in Form ODI – Part I (comprising six sections) for direct investments in Joint Venture (JV) / Wholly Owned Subsidiary (WOS) under automatic route / approval route. Further, remittances and other forms of financial commitment undertaken by the Indian Party (IP) are reported in Form ODI Part II. Annual Performance Report (APR) on the functioning of overseas JV / WOS in Form ODI Part III and details of disinvestment in Form ODI Part IV are currently required to be submitted through the designated Authorised Dealer Bank (AD bank). While Form ODI Part I and Part III are required to be submitted by the applicant undertaking ODI, the Form ODI Part II and Part IV are to be submitted by the AD bank on behalf of the applicant. In order to capture all data pertaining to the IP undertaking ODI as well as the related transaction, it has been decided to subsume Form ODI Part II within Form ODI Part I. Thus the Form ODI will have five sections instead of six.
3. The rationalised and revised Form ODI (Annex I) will now comprise the following parts:
Part I – Application for allotment of Unique Identification Number (UIN) and reporting of Remittances / Transactions:
Section A – Details of the IP / RI.
Section B – Capital Structure and other details of JV/ WOS/ SDS.
Section C - Details of Transaction/ Remittance/ Financial Commitment of IP/ RI.
Section D – Declaration by the IP/ RI.
Section E – Certificate by the statutory auditors of the IP/ self-certification by RI.
Part II - Annual Performance Report (APR)
Part III – Report on Disinvestment by way of
a.       Closure / Voluntary Liquidation / Winding up/ Merger/ Amalgamation of overseas JV / WOS;
b.      Sale/ Transfer of the shares of the overseas JV/ WOS to another eligible resident or non-resident;
c.       Closure / Voluntary Liquidation / Winding up/ Merger/ Amalgamation of IP; and
d.      Buy back of shares by the overseas JV/ WOS of the IP / RI.
4. Further, a new reporting format has also been introduced for Venture Capital Fund (VCF) / Alternate Investment Fund (AIF), Portfolio Investment and overseas investment by Mutual Funds as per the format in Annex II and Annex III. In case of reporting purchase and repurchase of ESOPs, the AD banks may continue to report the same in the existing format (Annex IV).
5. It is further advised that any post investment changes subsequent to the allotment of the UIN are required to be reported as indicated in the operational instructions on submission of Form ODI Part I (Annex I).
6. AD banks before executing any ODI transaction must obtain the Form ODI Part I from the applicant in terms of Regulation 6 (2) (vi) of the Notification, ibid. Further, the AD bank should report the relevant Form ODI in the online OID application and obtain UIN while executing the remittance.
7. In case of RI undertaking ODI, certification of Form ODI Part I by statutory auditor or chartered accountant need not be insisted upon. Self-certification by the RI concerned may be accepted.
8. The revised ODI forms and instructions for filling up the forms will come into effect immediately.
9. Reserve Bank reserves the right to place the information received through the forms in the public domain.
10. As hitherto, the AD banks would continue to receive the ODI forms as also documents related to the post investment changes in the physical form. These should be preserved UIN wise for submission to the Reserve Bank, if and when specifically required.
11. AD banks should put in place proper processes and systems and issue necessary instructions to all the dealing officials at the bank / branch level to ensure compliance with these guidelines.
Online Reporting of Form ODI
12. Online OID application has been revamped to further reduce the traditional paper based filing system, to provide the AD banks fast and easy accessibility to data for reference purpose, to improve the coverage and ensure proper monitoring of the flows in a dynamic environment. Accordingly, modules in online OID application have been added, wherein all the ODI forms as mentioned in this circular may be reported.
13. A concept of AD Maker, AD Checker and AD Authorizer has now been introduced in the online application process. The AD Maker shall initiate the transaction and submit to the AD Checker for verification of the transaction before submission to Reserve Bank. The AD Authorizer shall have the authority to ratify these ODI transaction which are pending due to various reasons, such as, delay arising on account of seeking further clarification from the IP / RI, technical difficulty in reporting the transaction in the online OID application and on account of delay in completing the due diligence process.
14. The AD bank may identify an official in the middle management level who may be assigned the responsibility of the AD Authorizer. The Authorizer shall be entrusted with the following responsibilities:
i.            Examining the genuineness of the reason/s behind late submission of the ODI Forms.
ii.            Ratifying those online transaction which are reported with a delay owing to operational difficulties after recording the facts in the online OID application under the Remarks column.
15. The Centralized Unit / Nodal Office of the AD bank should ensure online reporting of Overseas Investments in the application hosted on the websitehttps://oid.rbi.org.in
16. The AD Maker, AD Checker and AD Authoriser identified by the AD Bank may obtain a user-id for accessing the online OID application by submitting a request in the prescribed format (Annex V).
17. Any non-compliance with respect to the instruction for submission of Form ODI Part I, Part II and Part III shall be treated as contravention of Regulation 6 (2) (vi), Regulation 15 and Regulation 16 respectively, of the FEMA Notification No 120/RB-2004 dated July 07, 2004 as amended. The Reserve Bank will take a serious view on non-compliance with the guidelines / instructions and initiate penal action as considered necessary.
18. AD Category – I banks may bring the contents of this circular to the notice of their constituents and customers concerned.
20. The directions contained in this circular have been issued under sections 10(4) and 11(1) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act 1999 (42 of 1999) and are without prejudice to permissions / approvals, if any, required under any other law.

Corporate Governance by Listed and Unlisted Companies

Corporate Governance by Listed and Unlisted Companies

Meaning
Corporate Governance is the framework of rules and practices by which a board of directors ensures accountability, fairness, and transparency in a company's relationship with its all stakeholders. So to Clinch, Corporate governance includes the processes through which corporations' objectives are set and pursued in the context of the social, regulatory and market environment.

Who are Stakeholders?
-          Financiers
-          Customers
-          Management
-          Employees
-          Government
-          The Community
-          Creditors
-          Shareholders

In order to keep Company more transparent in front of all stakeholders, corporate governance is the technique by which companies are directed and managed. It means carrying the business keeping in mind the stakeholders' desires. It is actually conducted by the board of Directors and the concerned committees for the company's stakeholder's benefit.

Requirements under Companies Act 2013

Corporate Governance is most important for Listed Companies. To make listed companies more transparent and to align the provisions related to SEBI LODR 2015 with the Companies Act 2013, SEBI had come up with LODR 2015. Clause 49 in Listing Agreement is no longer present in Listing Agreement. It has been replaced by regulations in SEBI Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements 2015.
The objectives of the Clause 49 of Listing Agreement now read in Regulation 17 to 27 aligns with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, focuses on adopting best practices on corporate governance and aims at making the corporate governance framework more effective. The Provisions of Clause 49 of the erswhile Listing Agreement have been brought under Regulations 17 to 27 of SEBI LODR 2015

Key Takeaway:
SEBI LODR 2015 has come up with a new provision i.e. "Occassionally, the audit committee may meet without the presence of any executives of the listed entity"
Also, as per Reg 21(5) of SEBI LODR 2015, "Risk Management Committee would be applicable to top 100 listed entities which is determined on the basis of market capitalisation as at the end of the immediate previous FY."

Summary of the Companies act 2013 significant changes in the composition of the board of directors.
A.    Every Company is required to appoint 1 (one) Resident Director on its board.
B.     Nominee director shall no longer be treated as independent directors.
C.     Listed companies and Specified Classes of public companies are required to appoint independent directors and women directors on their boards.
D.    CA 2013 for the first time codifies the duties of the directors.
E.     SEBI amends the listing agreement (with prospective effect from October 01, 2014 to align it with CA 2013.
F. SEBI brought in new Regulations SEBI LODR 2015 w.e.f September 02, 2015 replacing various clauses including Clause 49 of erswhile Listing Agreement. Again these regulations were more or less same as given under Listing Agreement


I. BOARD COMPOSITION



Number of Directors

The composition of the board:
Differences;
Companies Act 1956
Companies Act 2013
·         Companies Act 1956 permitted a company to determine the maximum number of directors on its board by way of its articles of association. Companies Act 1956 required public companies to obtain Central Government's approval for increasing the number of its directors above the limit prescribed in its articles or if such increase would lead to the total number of directors on the board exceeding 12 (twelve) directors.

·         A company may have a maximum of 15 (fifteen) directors
Companies Act 2013 however, permits every company to appoint directors above the prescribed limit of 15 (fifteen) by authorizing such increase through a special resolution.
Important Point: Allowing companies to increase the maximum number of directors on their boards by way of a special resolution would ensure greater flexibility to companies.



Classes of directors

RESIDENT DIRECTOR: Resident Director is a new concept under Companies Act 2013.
Section 149 of Companies Act 2013 provides for the requirement of appointing a resident director, i.e., a person who has stayed in India for a total period of not less than 182 (one hundred and eighty two) days in the previous calendar year.

Important Point: The requirement to have a resident director on the board of companies has been viewed as a move to ensure that boards of Indian companies do not comprise entirely of non-resident directors. This provision has caused significant difficulties to companies, since it has been brought into force with immediate effect, requiring companies to restructure their boards immediately to ensure compliance with Companies Act 2013.
To know more about the Independent Directors, please check the link below;


What is important to keep checking that your company has Good Corporate Governance Practices?
-          Board Structure as given above
-          Disclosures and Reporting
o   Increased Disclosures and assertions in Director’s Report (Risk Management, Internal Control, Legal Compliance, CSR, etc.)
o   Compulsory Consolidation of Accounts, summary of JVs, Subsidiaries
o   Disclosures for Public Money lying unutilised
-          Risks, Control and Compliance
o   Implementation of Risk Policy
o   Systems to check all applicable laws being followed or not
To know more, contact us at CSnehaseth@gmail.com or call us at 9871903449



Independent Directors through the lenses of Companies Act 1956, SEBI LODR 2015 and Companies Act 2013

Independent Directors :
Criteria
Companies Act 1956
Regulation 17 to 27 of SEBI LODR 2015
Companies Act 2013
Number of Independent Directors
No requirement for companies to appoint an independent director on its board. Provisions related to independent directors were set out in Clause 49 of the Listing Agreement ("Listing Agreement").
As per SEBI LODR 2015, only listed entities were required to appoint independent directors to be equal to (i) one third of the board, where the chairman of the board is a non-executive director; or (ii) one half of the board, where the chairman is an executive director.

However, under CA 2013, the following companies are required to appoint independent directors:
Public listed company: At least one third of the board to be comprised of independent directors; and
Certain specified companies that meet the criteria listed below are required to have at least 2 (two) independent directors:
1)         Public companies which have paid up share capital of INR 100,000,000 (Rupees one hundred million only);
2)         Public companies which have a turnover of 1,000,000,000 (Rupees one billion only); and
3)         Public companies which have, in the aggregate, outstanding loans, debentures and deposits exceeding INR 500,000,000 (Rupees five hundred million only)
Qualification criteria:
Detailed qualifications for the appointment of an independent director on the board of a company. Some important qualifications include:
a. he / she should be a person of integrity, relevant expertise and experience;
b.he / she is not or was not a promoter of, or related to the promoter or director of the company or its holding, subsidiary or associate company;
c. he / she has or had no pecuniary relationship with the company, its holding, subsidiary or associate company, or their promoters, or directors during the 2 (two) immediately preceding financial years or during the current financial year;
d.           a person, none of whose relatives have or had pecuniary relationship or transaction with the company, its holding, subsidiary or associate company.

Maximum Limit of Directorship

Companies Act 1956 permitted a company to determine the maximum number of directors on its board by way of its articles of association. Companies Act 1956 required public companies to obtain Central Government's approval for increasing the number of its directors above the limit prescribed in its articles or if such increase would lead to the total number of directors on the board exceeding 12 (twelve) directors.

A person shall not serve as an independent director in more than 7 listed companies. Further, any person who is serving as a whole time director in any listed company, shall serve as an independent director in not more than 3 listed companies.
SEBI LODR also provides the maximum limit of 7 listed companies, while the Companies Act, 2013 provides the maximum limit of 10 public companies.

According to Section 165(1) of the Act, no person, after the commencement of this Act, (i.e. w. e. f. 01st April, 2014) shall hold office as a director, including any alternate directorship, in more than 20 companies at the same time.

Provided that the maximum number of public companies in which a person can be appointed as a director shall not exceed 10.
The Companies Act, 2013 does not provide any separate limit on the number of persons in which a person can be appointed as Independent Director but the general limit provided in Section 165(1) of the act shall be applicable in case of Independent Director also


Retire by rotation

The Independent Directors under Companies Act, 2013 will not be liable to retire by rotation nor will their strength be considered for determining the total number of director liable to retire by rotation.

Maximum tenure of Independent Directors

Reg 17 to 27 of SEBI LODR 2015: An independent director shall hold office, for a term up to five consecutive years, on the Board of a company and shall be eligible for reappointment for another term of up to five consecutive years on passing of a special resolution by the company.
                                          
Provided that a person who has already served as an independent director for five years or more in a company as on October 1, 2014 shall be eligible for appointment, on completion of his present term, for one more term of up to five years only.

Provided further that an independent director, who completes his above mentioned term, shall be eligible for appointment as independent director in the company only after the expiration of three years of ceasing to be an independent director in the company

Companies Act, 2013: An independent director shall hold office for a term up to five consecutive years on the Board of a company, but shall be eligible for reappointment on passing of a special resolution by the company and disclosure of such appointment in the Board's report.

Notwithstanding anything to above, no independent director shall hold office for more than two consecutive terms, but such independent director shall be eligible for appointment after the expiration of three years of ceasing to become an independent director:

Provided that an independent director shall not, during the said period of three years, be appointed in or be associated with the company in any other capacity, either directly or indirectly.

Manner of Appointment

SEBI LODR 2015 prescribes the manner of appointment of Independent Director in the manner prescribed under Companies Act, 2013.  The letter of appointment along with the detailed profile of independent director shall be disclosed on the websites of the company and the Stock Exchanges not later than one working day from the date of such appointment. While under Companies Act, 2013 the terms and conditions of appointment of independent directors shall also be posted on the company’s website.

Performance Evaluation of Independent Directors


SEBI LODR 2015: The provisions in respect of the performance evaluation of Independent Directors are as follows:

1.      The Nomination Committee shall lay down the evaluation criteria for performance evaluation of independent directors.

2.      The company shall disclose the criteria for performance evaluation, as laid down by the Nomination Committee, in its Annual Report.

3.      The performance evaluation of independent directors shall be done by the entire Board of Directors (excluding the director being evaluated).

4.      On the basis of the report of performance evaluation, it shall be determined whether to extend or continue the term of appointment of the independent director.

Companies Act, 2013: According to Section 149(8) of the Act, the company and independent directors shall abide by the provisions specified in Schedule IV. According to Schedule IV of the Act, the performance evaluation of independent directors shall be done by the entire Board of Directors, excluding the director being evaluated. On the basis of the report of performance evaluation, it shall be determined whether to extend or continue the term of appointment of the independent director.

The Nomination Committee shall lay down the evaluation criteria for performance evaluation of independent directors. The company shall disclose the criteria for performance evaluation, as laid down by the Nomination Committee, in its Annual Report. While under Companies Act, 2013 the Nomination and Remuneration Committee shall identify persons who are qualified to become directors and who may be appointed in senior management in accordance with the criteria laid down, recommend to the Board their appointment and removal and shall carry out evaluation of every director’s performance.
Separate Meeting of Independent Directors

SEBI LODR 2015, the provisions of the separate meeting of Independent Directors are as follows:

a)      The independent directors of the company shall hold at least one meeting in a year, without the attendance of non-independent directors and members of management. All the independent directors of the company shall strive to be present at such meeting.

b)      The independent directors in the meeting shall, inter-alia:

        i.            review the performance of non-independent directors and the Board as a whole;

      ii.            review the performance of the Chairperson of the company, taking into account the views of executive directors and non-executive directors;

    iii.            assess the quality, quantity and timeliness of flow of information between the company management and the Board, that is necessary for the Board to effectively and reasonably perform their duties.

Companies Act, 2013: Schedule IV of the Companies Act, 2013 also contains same provisions of separate meeting of Independent Directors. The Independent Director is entitled for sitting fees, reimbursement of expenses for participation in the Board and other meetings and profit related commission as may be approved by the members. Rule 4 of The Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014 prescribes the maximum sitting fees of Rs. 1 lakh per meeting to the Independent Director for attending any Board meeting.


Training of Independent Directors

SEBI LODR 2015 also contains the provisions relating to training of Independent Directors. 

a)      The company shall provide suitable training to independent directors to familiarize them with the company, their roles, rights, responsibilities in the company, nature of the industry in which the company operates, business model of the company, etc.

b)      The details of such training imparted shall be disclosed in the Annual Report

Companies Act, 2013: The Companies Act, 2013 does not contain such provisions. Schedule IV of the Companies Act, 2013 prescribes the guidelines of professional conduct, roles and functions and duties of the independent directors. According to sub section 8 of Section 149, the company and independent directors shall abide by the provisions specified in Schedule IV.

___________________________________

Remuneration of Independent Directors

The Nomination and Remuneration Committee is the exclusive authority to recommend to the Board a policy, relating to remuneration to directors. All fees/compensation, if any paid to non-executive directors, including independent directors, shall be fixed by the Board of Directors and shall require previous approval of shareholders in general meeting. The requirement of obtaining prior approval of shareholders in general meeting shall not apply to payment of sitting fees to non-executive directors, if made within the limits prescribed under the Companies Act, 2013 for payment of sitting fees (maximum prescribed amount is Rs. 1 lakh per meeting) without approval of the Central Government. The Independent Directors shall not be entitled for any stock option.

Companies Act, 2013: The Nomination and Remuneration Committee is the exclusive authority to recommend to the Board a policy, relating to remuneration to directors. According to Section 197(4) of the Act, the remuneration payable to the directors of a company, including any managing or whole-time director or manager, shall be determined, in accordance with and subject to the provisions of this section, either by the articles of the company, or by a resolution or, if the articles so require, by a special resolution, passed by the company in general meeting and the remuneration payable to a director determined aforesaid shall be inclusive of the remuneration payable to him for the services rendered by him in any other capacity. A director may receive remuneration by way of fee for attending meetings of the Board or Committee thereof or for any other purpose whatsoever as may be decided by the Board (Maximum prescribed amount is Rs. 1lakh per meeting). The Independent Directors shall not be entitled for any stock option.

Resignation or Removal of Independent Directors

SEBI LODR 2015 does not prescribe the manner of resignation/removal of independent directors. It only provides that an independent director who resigns or is removed from the Board of the Company shall be replaced by a new independent director at the earliest but not later than the immediate next Board meeting or three months from the date of such vacancy, whichever is later. Where the company fulfils the requirement of independent directors in its Board even without filling the vacancy created by such resignation or removal, as the case may be, the requirement of replacement by a new independent director shall not apply. The Board of the company shall satisfy itself that plans are in place for orderly succession for appointments to the Board and to senior management.

The Companies Act, 2013: Section 168 and 169 of the Act prescribes the manner of resignation and removal of directors, including Independent Directors. Further, Schedule IV of the Act prescribes that an independent director who resigns or is removed from the Board of the company shall be replaced by a new independent director within a period of not more than one hundred and eighty days from the date of such resignation or removal, as the case may be. Where the company fulfils the requirement of independent directors in its Board even without filling the vacancy created by such resignation or removal, as the case may be, the requirement of replacement by a new independent director shall not apply.


For more details, contact CS Neha Seth at csnehaseth@gmail.com or call us at 9871903449